Pick one and we will keep it short. Three taps and you are done.
We run calls seven days a week, and we answer the phone around the clock.
Last step. We will call you back to confirm the window.
An emergency deserves a person, not a web form sitting in an inbox. Call the shop and we pick up.
No heat, no water, an active leak, or a backed up main. These move to the front of the line, day or night, weekend or holiday.
Your request is in and somebody will call you back to confirm a window. Here is what we have:
Ductwork is the part of the system nobody sells and everybody blames. Put a correctly sized new furnace or air conditioner on leaking or undersized ducts and it will underperform, and the equipment gets blamed for a distribution problem.
Here is the sequence we find over and over around Woodbridge. A house goes up in the seventies. It gets a new system in the nineties, another one fifteen years later, and each time the installer ties into the duct runs that were already there. Somewhere in between a basement got finished or a room went in over the garage, and whoever did it tapped the nearest trunk without enlarging it. The equipment has been replaced twice. The ducts never have.
ENERGY STAR's list of reasons to consider replacing your equipment includes 'Some rooms in your home are too hot or too cold' and 'Your home has excessive dust.' Both are on that list. Both are also, in a lot of the houses we walk into, a duct problem wearing an equipment costume.
InterNACHI's life expectancy chart, the one most home inspectors work from, puts ducting at 60 to 100 years, with its own caveat that the figures are 'only as a general guideline and not as a guarantee or warranty'. A table widely attributed to ASHRAE says 30 years, and we do not lean on that one, because the handbook it supposedly comes from is paywalled and the copy circulating online carries no edition or year.
Nobody has a trustworthy number, and the number was never the point. Sheet metal in a dry basement can outlast the mortgage. Flexible duct in a Virginia attic gets judged on what it looks like when we open the hatch: crushed, sagging between supports, or pulled off the boot and quietly conditioning the insulation.
That cuts against the usual pitch. If someone quoted you a whole new duct system because the ducts are 'old', ask them to show you the defect. Most of our duct work is sealing, insulating and resizing, because that is where the return on your money is. Full replacement is for runs that are collapsed, unreachable, or too small to ever carry the air.
The trade is vague about leakage. The code is not. Virginia Residential Code Section N1103.3.6 sets total leakage limits where the energy code calls for a duct test: 4.0 cubic feet per minute per 100 square feet of conditioned floor area on a postconstruction test, and 8.0 cfm per 100 square feet where every duct and the air handler sit entirely inside the heated and cooled part of the house. The looser limit exists for a reason. If the leak is inside the envelope, the air you paid to condition is still in the building.
Two details get missed. The limit is measured against the floor area of the house, not the size of the ducts, so a 2,000 square foot house is allowed about 80 cfm across the whole system. And the test runs at a set pressure, 0.1 inch water gauge, registers taped shut.
| Requirement | What the code says | Section |
|---|---|---|
| Total leakage, postconstruction test | 4.0 cfm or less per 100 sq ft of conditioned floor area | N1103.3.6 |
| Total leakage, everything inside the thermal envelope | 8.0 cfm or less per 100 sq ft of conditioned floor area | N1103.3.6 |
| Test pressure | 0.1 inch water gauge (25 Pa), registers sealed, air handler cabinet included | N1103.3.5 |
| Who may test | The licensed mechanical contractor who installed the system, if trained on the equipment. Signed report goes to the code official | N1103.3.5 |
| Sealing | "Ducts, air handlers and filter boxes shall be sealed" | N1103.3.4 |
| Air handler cabinet leakage | Manufacturer designation of not more than 2 percent of design airflow | N1103.3.4.1 |
| Duct insulation outside conditioned space | R-8 for ducts 3 inches and larger, R-6 for smaller ducts | N1103.3.1 |
| Equipment sizing | ACCA Manual S selection, based on loads calculated to ACCA Manual J | M1401.3 |
Section M1401.3 requires that equipment 'shall be sized in accordance with ACCA Manual S or other approved sizing methodologies based on building loads calculated in accordance with ACCA Manual J'. Both documents appear in the state's own list of standards incorporated into the building code, as Manual J-16 and Manual S-14. That listing is what makes a load calculation Virginia law rather than a nice idea. Most replacement quotes written here skip it. 'You had a three ton, we will put in a three ton' is not a load calculation.
The code leaves some room on the result. M1401.3 allows more capacity than Manual S gives for multi-stage equipment, or where the next standard size up is the only one that covers both the total and the sensible heat gain. Running the calculation is the part that is not optional.
Then comes the part the code leaves alone. A load calculation tells you how much heating and cooling the house needs. It says nothing about whether your ducts can carry it. Duct design is a separate ACCA procedure, Manual D, and Virginia does not incorporate that one, so we will not call it a code requirement. It is the step that decides whether the new system behaves the way the brochure says.
ENERGY STAR puts the airflow problem plainly: 'If you purchase a new energy-efficient air conditioner but connect it to an older furnace and blower motor, your system will not perform to its rated efficiency.' A heat pump raises the stakes, because it moves more air to deliver the same heat as the furnace it replaces. Duct capacity is usually the real constraint on a heat pump retrofit, so we measure first.
Most comfort complaints we trace end on the return side rather than the supply. A room can have plenty of air coming in and nowhere for it to leave, so it pressurizes and the supply air stops arriving. Adding a return has fixed rooms that two previous companies tried to solve by selling more capacity.
Additions are the other repeat offender. A sunroom gets tapped off the nearest trunk, the trunk keeps the cross section it had when it served only the original house, and now the whole floor is short of air. No thermostat setting fixes that.
Duct work takes a mechanical permit. USBC Section 108.1 requires one before any alteration involving a mechanical system. Virginia sets no statewide permit fee, so the amount is whatever your locality publishes, and borderline calls belong to the building official.
The inspection that matters is in USBC Section 113.3, item 5: mechanical materials and equipment are inspected 'prior to concealment'. Section 113.6 is blunter. Defects have to be corrected and reinspected before any work proceeds that would conceal them, so the drywall waits. Prince William County inspections are scheduled by 3 p.m. the working day before.
On which edition applies, since contractor sites routinely garble this: Virginia adopted the 2021 I-codes effective January 18, 2024. The edition year and the effective date are different numbers. A house or townhouse is Group R-5 under the Virginia Residential Code, and work in an existing building is read against the Virginia Existing Building Code too. That is why replacing duct in a 1972 house does not drag the whole house up to new construction standards, though the new work has to meet current code.
Related reading on the equipment side: air conditioning repair and installation, furnace repair and installation, and maintenance and tune-ups, and pipe materials by decade if your house is old enough that the ducts are not the only thing from another era.
One call covers plumbing and HVAC. Talk to somebody who has been doing this for decades.
